The Segregation Ordinance, Part II: Race Riots
Ashland, VA, taken in 1900, courtesy of the Ashland Museum. |
After the war, Ashland’s main source of income, the Slash Resort, had closed and was
abandoned. The horse racing track in Ashland had been transformed into a soldier camp and was never restored. Fortunately, the college of Randolph-Macon, located in a small town in rural Mecklenburg County, was looking to relocate to an area closer to Richmond and to modern transportation. The empty resort proved a perfect match for the institution and the college moved to Ashland in 1868, three years after Lee surrendered to Grant. The school brought much needed commerce to the community as businesses opened to serve the students and professors. Had it not been for the relocation of Randolph-Macon, the town of Ashland might not have seen the twentieth century as the Civil War had destroyed the economy of the southern states.
While
the relocation of the college helped to rebuild the town’s economy, racial
tension would begin to grow throughout the South as
whites reacted to a free black population. Provisional
governments set up by the United States gave blacks the opportunity to hold government
offices and make decisions for their communities, but these newly appointed powers
intimidated and frustrated many whites who were used to subservient blacks. Feeling threatened, whites often resorted to
fear mongering to keep control.
After the
surrender of the Confederate Army, the United States viewed the South as a conquered
territory and instituted military rule that removed all of the former state and
local political leadership. These actions caused resentment among whites
which grew into the myth of the Lost Cause: that the Civil War was a “heroic
sacrifice and honorific commitment to duty and family.” Vanderbilt
University Professor Larry Griffin explained this reaction in his essay, Why
Was the South a Problem?:
“The South created its own myth of the Lost Cause to explain the Civil War as heroic sacrifice and
honorific. It challenged America’s definition of Reconstruction by
redefining it to be nothing more than orchestrated villainy, corruption,
degeneracy, and political debasement, and it acted on those understandings by
inflaming and unleashing the Klan of the 1870s.”
In the rural American South,
tensions between whites and blacks were
well established by the turn of the twentieth century. The
resulting segregation
laws and racism can be seen in the stories from small towns: in
their letters,
their newspapers, and in their public history.
The Danville Circular
An incident in Danville, Virginia in 1883 revealed the negative
repercussions of reconstruction and the political instability that it caused.
During the years immediately following the Civil War, the United States placed black and white
Republican lawmakers in government seats. The
Readjuster Party, which was Republican and biracial, carried a majority in Virginia’s General Assembly in 1879, and the
influences of this party spread to local, municipal governments as well.
One goal of Reconstruction governments was tobetter represent both black and white citizens and in the
city of Danville, Virginia, this was achieved by dividing the city government into wards, so
that the votes of blacks would carry as much influence as that of whites. As blacks
took on more leadership roles (this included law enforcement and city council members), the
whites of Danville felt ostracized.
A group of thirty white
business owners wrote and published an open letter,referred to as the “Danville Circular,” to the citizens of Southwest
Virginia stating that the whites of Danville were suffering humiliation, indignity, and
intimidation by blacks. The letter also (falsely) stated that the blacks
on the Danville city council were going to annex a black neighborhood just
outside of the city limits which would swing the majority in their direction
and ensure that it would be “impossible for any white man to hold office in the
town.”
The publication of this
overtly racist letter caused the public condemnation of blacks in front of
large crowds in the main streets of Danville. On Saturday, November 3rd, 1883, the tensions of one mob continued into the next day with
an open riot and hundreds of individuals firing guns in the streets. Four
black men were killed and two white men were wounded, but not before the State
government sent in militia troops to keep the peace and ensure an orderly
election. The publication of the Circular succeeded in inciting
whites to exert control and intimidation over blacks. It showed the
power of fear, and the Danville Riot allowed the white Democrats to win the
elections and return to power.
This riot
became the foundation for a tradition of fear, where whites were constantly told to be wary
of blacks because of their tendency to violence and riots. The irony is
that most riots during this time period sprang from interactions with
aggressive whites, and the majority of casualties were blacks because whites
had more access to guns.
Rumors of mob violence or riots would be
sufficient to spurn whites to request military support, and this
pattern of fear and suppression was successful in keeping blacks in
subservient roles. Almost twenty years after the Civil War, in 1902,
Ashland was a town full of commerce and activity. The
college of Randolph-Macon had brought new residents to the town,
which now housed half a dozen bars and taverns, as well as shops and stores.
The Richmond,
Fredericksburg, and Potomac Railroad, who owned the train tracks that
ran through the town, was busy installing a second track, and their workers,
who were mostly African-Americans, lived in temporary a camp north
of Ashland near Doswell. These workers would be paid on a
Friday night, and they would travel into the nearest town to spend
their wages.
On
Sunday, August 31st, 1902, The Times newspaper of Richmond reported
that there had been tension between whites and blacks in the town of Ashland
for several weeks following an altercation between a black man, Walter Latney,
and a white man named Welford Trevillian. It is notable that the
newspaper mentioned the occupations of the fathers of these two
men. Mr. Trevillian’s father was the “Town Sergeant,” and
Mr.
Latney’s father was described as the “town scavenger.” It was
reported that Mr. Latney made an offensive remark to Mr. Trevillian as they
passed in the street and the two got into a physical fight. Bystanders
became involved, and Mr. Latney was arrested and taken to jail.
The following night,
the same groups of whites and blacks who had been bystanders of, or
involved in, the fight between Latney and Trevillian, returned to the downtown Ashland
area. A rock was reportedly thrown by someone in the groups of blacks, and struck
a white man, Richard F. Bierne, on the head and required several stitches.
To calm the situation, the Mayor of Ashland deputized “a half-dozen or
more” special police officers, which were presumably young, white men.
These special officers arrested one man, a black railroad worker, who
they found to be armed. The article does not mention where the black man
was found nor why he was arrested for carrying a gun, as it would have been
presumed that many men were armed.
The next evening, September 1st, 1902, found many
groups of young black and white men in the
center of town. The excitement of these groups was heightened from the previous
confrontations and this evenings someone fired a gun into the air which sent people
fleeing. The next morning, the body of a black man, James Morris, was
found in an
alley near the center of town. He had
been shot in the back.
The mayor of
Ashland,who also
was the judge on the local courts, ruled that they could not determine who shot Mr.
Morris, and installed a curfew on the town to prevent any more violence.
He also asked the
governor to send state militia troops to Ashland who patrolled the streets for three
days.
In both the Danville and
Ashland riot, the only injured or deceased were black men, but the behavior of
whites were never called into question. It was a common tactic to deploy
large shows of force in response to “negro problems,” regardless of the actual
threat to any community. Whites were able to point to these
incidents as examples of the need to keep blacks economically restrained and
physically separated from the white community, and usher in Jim Crow
segregation ordinances.
Ashland was fortunate that
no riot broke out over the rumor of Booker T. Washington starting a school for
Negroes; by 1911, white Virginians were using laws and ordinances to keep black
people oppressed.
1 comment:
Thank you for writing this. I find it fascinating and look forward to the next installment!
Post a Comment